[NTLK] iOS Einstein submitted to the Apple App Store - rejected

Dennis B. Swaney romad at aol.com
Fri Feb 11 18:14:40 EST 2011

On 11/02/11 13:09PST, Matthias Melcher wrote:
> Unsurprisingly, iOSEinstein got rejected today for three reasons:
> 1: I am using an undocumented function. This could easily be removed
> 2: we require that the user loads a ROM which for Apple constitutes "loading executable code". That is in fact so, but is that really the intention of that rule? I always understood the rule as a way to avoid circumventing the store by uploading an interpreter and then sneaking in user code later. Even though iOSEinstein could do that, I have a hard time imagining that someone would write a custom Newton ROM just to sneak code by... .
> One solution would be to integrate the ROM, but "the" ROM obviously has a copyright, and writing our own compatible ROM without ever peeking at the Newton original is not feasible (and if it was, I would write a new OS instead of a Newton ROM, making the emulator obsolete, running at 100% speed)
> 3: is the one that ruins it for good though. There is a rule that no submitted app may be similar to an existing Apple product. Well, I can see that they would not like to see a clone of iTunes in their store, but a 12 year plus abandoned product?
> Well, they make the rules. No reason to fret.

I expected that they would use the "No emulators" rule. Can you ask them 
to point out the currently existing product?

Dennis B. Swaney

Newton MP 2100
iPhone 3GS

More information about the NewtonTalk mailing list