Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue

From: Martin Joseph (martyNT_at_barknaturalpet.com)
Date: Fri Oct 15 2004 - 10:48:56 PDT

Next message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] T39 or T68i connection With MP2100"
In reply to: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Next in thread: LAG: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Reply: LAG: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Oct 15, 2004, at 6:08 AM, Roman Pixell wrote:

> its a modular computer that doesnt make compromises.

I disagree completely, I think it makes too many compromises. Crappy
battery life and Microsoft windows are two that clearly make this a
waste of time and space AFAIK.

Marty

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] T39 or T68i connection With MP2100"
In reply to: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Next in thread: LAG: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Reply: LAG: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 15 2004 - 14:00:02 PDT