Re: [NTLK] "Complete Moron's Guide(TM) to SimpleMail 4.3 on NOS 2.1" at the Wiki, but [Q] no Receive yet - huh

From: Martin Joseph (martyNT_at_barknaturalpet.com)
Date: Fri May 21 2004 - 16:55:22 PDT

Next message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Recelling battery pack with 2400 cells"
Previous message: Simon Bell: "Re: [NTLK] SimpleMail 4.3: No Receive solved (d'oh) * Wet Donkey! * Open [Q]s"
In reply to: Dan Fackler: "Re: [NTLK] "Complete Moron's Guide(TM) to SimpleMail 4.3 on NOS 2.1" at the Wiki, but [Q] no Receive yet - huh"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On May 21, 2004, at 2:45 PM, Dan Fackler wrote:

> Check the Wiki for SimpleMail 4.3. It implies that Mail V is needed
> for IMAP
> servers. My copy of SimpleMail 4.3 has an option to set up for IMAP.

True, but if your using IMAP, then Mail V is better.

marty

PS Mail V needs IMAP

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Recelling battery pack with 2400 cells"
Previous message: Simon Bell: "Re: [NTLK] SimpleMail 4.3: No Receive solved (d'oh) * Wet Donkey! * Open [Q]s"
In reply to: Dan Fackler: "Re: [NTLK] "Complete Moron's Guide(TM) to SimpleMail 4.3 on NOS 2.1" at the Wiki, but [Q] no Receive yet - huh"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 21 2004 - 17:30:02 PDT