Re: [NTLK] confused about rom 2.1

From: Matthew Reidsrow (junkmail_at_reidsrow.com)
Date: Thu Feb 19 2004 - 12:07:44 PST

• Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] -48022 and No Dates"
• Previous message: Matthew Reidsrow: "Re: [NTLK] -48022 and No Dates"
• In reply to: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] confused about rom 2.1"
• Next in thread: Frank Gruendel: "Re: [NTLK] confused about rom 2.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Feb 19, 2004, at 5:29 AM, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:

> nelson (bnelson6_at_valuelinx.net) wrote:
>
>> ok found a 2.1 rom in a 130, thought only 2000's had those. chip has
>> v2.1 1995 apple on it.
>
> Whatever that version number might refer to, it can't possibly be NOS
> 2.1
> if it dates back to 1995.

Likely a difference between hardware numbers (the chip itself) and the
software version contained within (the ROM #)

Matthew Reidsma
Boston, Mass, U.S.A.
matthew_at_reidsrow.com

http://newtonnews.org : One stop shopping for the Green connected mind.

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] -48022 and No Dates"
• Previous message: Matthew Reidsrow: "Re: [NTLK] -48022 and No Dates"
• In reply to: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] confused about rom 2.1"
• Next in thread: Frank Gruendel: "Re: [NTLK] confused about rom 2.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 19 2004 - 12:30:02 PST