Re: [NTLK] PDF viewer

From: Benedek Gergely (i3enedek_at_mac.com)
Date: Thu Mar 10 2005 - 09:40:44 PST

Next message: Norman Palardy: "Re: [NTLK] New Apple Palmtop Mac? vs ematae"
Previous message: Adam Ladds: "Re: [NTLK] New Apple Palmtop Mac? vs ematae"
In reply to: David Cohen (Improcom): "Re: [NTLK] PDF viewer"
Next in thread: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] PDF viewer"
Reply: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] PDF viewer"
Reply: Mike R. Manzano: "Re: [NTLK] PDF viewer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I think Adobe would have to do that - isn't it a closed protocol?
Its an open standard.

>It has been discussed before, and the answer was that it was too hard.
Surely it cant be that hard if the graphics and embedded font parts were
just ignored.

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Norman Palardy: "Re: [NTLK] New Apple Palmtop Mac? vs ematae"
Previous message: Adam Ladds: "Re: [NTLK] New Apple Palmtop Mac? vs ematae"
In reply to: David Cohen (Improcom): "Re: [NTLK] PDF viewer"
Next in thread: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] PDF viewer"
Reply: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] PDF viewer"
Reply: Mike R. Manzano: "Re: [NTLK] PDF viewer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 10 2005 - 11:00:01 PST