Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for ma c)

From: Humphreys, David (URB) (david.humphreys_at_honeywell.com)
Date: Tue Feb 17 2004 - 10:31:58 PST

Next message: Zachery Bir: "[NTLK] newtontalk AIM group chat"
Previous message: Humphreys, David (URB): "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for mac)"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for ma c)"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for ma c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Humphreys, David (URB) [mailto:david.humphreys_at_honeywell.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:14 PM
> To: 'newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net'
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping
> support for
> mac)
>
>
Boy! I hate answering my own posts...

> The better medium at the moment is CD (until something else
> comes along to supplant it).

N.B. DAT specs are better than CD but the the emphasis was on CD's so I didn't mention DAT.

Just in-case someone yells 'But what about DAT yada, yada, yada...

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Zachery Bir: "[NTLK] newtontalk AIM group chat"
Previous message: Humphreys, David (URB): "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for mac)"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for ma c)"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]cd VS Vinyl was( OT Palm dropping support for ma c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 17 2004 - 11:00:02 PST