From: karel Jansens (kareljansens_at_tiscalinet.be)
Date: Sun Aug 15 2004 - 14:15:51 PDT
Andrew Beals wrote:
> kareljansens_at_tiscalinet.be said:
>
>>Go's PenPoint wasn't bad. It's a shame it can't be open-sourced.
>
>
> The problem is that the ownership is somewhat cloudy after many acquisitions
> and sales. Who's holding the source? Who is going to sue if it gets released?
As I understand it, bankrupt Go's creditors are a bunch of tight-arsed
misers, who still expect someone to pay them for the sources.
Does it show that, not even knowing them, I don't like them a lot?
Karel Jansens
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 15 2004 - 16:30:02 PDT