Re: [NTLK] Newton Book or Newton Paperback, which is better

From: Jon Glass (jonglass_at_usa.net)
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 12:19:06 PDT


on 4/21/04 7:22 PM, DJ Vollkasko at DJ_Vollkasko_at_gmx.net wrote:

> On the down side, Paperbacks are mostly pretty artless documents (which
> sometimes appalls me - somebody put years of their lives into a book, so why
> not treat the book with some respect - but that's just my personal bibliomanic
> itch, I guess), they have no table of contents, no links, no illustrations, no
> bookmarks, after a reset Paperbacks forget where you stopped reading...

This isn't exactly true. Paperback books _can_ have a table of contents of
chapters. You give it the text you use for Chapter headings, and it
generates them when making the package. Unfortunately, as was already
mentioned, there is no bookmark feature which it needs.

-- 
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<mailto:jonglass_at_usa.net>
"There is more credit and satisfaction in being a first-rate truck driver
than a tenth-rate executive." - B.C. Forbes 
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 21 2004 - 12:30:01 PDT