Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Sun Sep 07 2003 - 11:49:25 PDT

Next message: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #3"
In reply to: Paul Miller: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Next in thread: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Reply: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Paul Miller wrote:
> So is a full version of Dateman available?

http://www.standalone.com/newtonos/index.shtml

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #3"
In reply to: Paul Miller: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Next in thread: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Reply: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 07 2003 - 13:30:00 PDT