Re: [NTLK] protected memory

From: Paul Guyot (pguyot_at_kallisys.net)
Date: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 21:31:52 PDT

Next message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] WLAN broadcast? (was A Newton Replacement: facts)"
Previous message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] Newton Date limitation"
In reply to: doppler: "[NTLK] protected memory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Aux environs du 7/10/03 à 2:42 +0200, sous le titre "[NTLK] protected
memory", doppler prit sa plus belle plume pour écrire les mots
suivants:
>a technical question: is the newton memory "protected"? from what i
>understood reading the FAQ, the answer is both yes and no...

Both yes and no.

If it's in like: "look, this OS has protected memory so it will no
longer crash as it used to", then, no, this marketing-ese cannot
apply to the Newton.

Paul

-- 
Philosophie de baignoire - consultations sur rendez-vous.
NPDS/NewtonOS: http://newton.kallisys.net:8080/
Apache/FreeBSD: http://www.kallisys.com/
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] WLAN broadcast? (was A Newton Replacement: facts)"
Previous message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] Newton Date limitation"
In reply to: doppler: "[NTLK] protected memory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 06 2003 - 22:00:01 PDT