Re: [NTLK] What about this?

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 06:54:48 PDT

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] FaxSFT (ex: Re: Addendum to Frank Gruendel's Fax story)"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Recognition of double t"
In reply to: David Mills: "[NTLK] What about this?"
Next in thread: Leigh Honeywell: "Re: [NTLK] What about this?"
Reply: Leigh Honeywell: "Re: [NTLK] What about this?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

David Mills wrote:
> What does everyone think?
> EBay Item number: 3042088986

To me these things are for collectors only, first of all a 2100 is
better on general (apart from GPS) and second, once you use it it will
become used anyway.
(does sound logical, doesn't it? ;-)

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] FaxSFT (ex: Re: Addendum to Frank Gruendel's Fax story)"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Recognition of double t"
In reply to: David Mills: "[NTLK] What about this?"
Next in thread: Leigh Honeywell: "Re: [NTLK] What about this?"
Reply: Leigh Honeywell: "Re: [NTLK] What about this?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 19 2003 - 08:00:01 PDT