Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question

From: PCBman (pcbman_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: Wed Apr 30 2003 - 08:31:17 PDT

Next message: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]OT iPod mutates!"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Ruprecht: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question"
Next in thread: E. Male: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

-------Original Message-------
From: Chris Ruprecht <chris_at_ruprecht.org>
Sent: 04/30/03 12:39 PM
To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
Subject: Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question

>
> 7500 songs will NOT fit onto a 30 GB drive...

They are most likely refering to AAC encoding @ 128kb/s or less.
This sounds much better than 128kb/s MP3.
It would allow them to get the stated capacity and retain quality.

Its all subjective but I am constantly surprised by the quality of lower bitrate AAC.

Then of course there is MP4...

PCBman

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK]OT iPod mutates!"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Ruprecht: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question"
Next in thread: E. Male: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 12:00:02 PDT