Re: [NTLK] Cursive Handwriting Recognition

From: Oliver Brose (oliver.brose_at_t-online.de)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 03:01:59 EST


> Subject: [NTLK] Cursive Handwriting Recognition
> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:30:18 +0100
> From: Chris Searles <csearles_at_netcologne.de>
>
>
> (I asked this question a couple of days ago, but it was at the end of
> another thread so maybe nobody noticed it.)
>
> Is there a big difference in the quality of CURSIVE handwriting
> recognition between a 2x00 Newton and a Newton 130, i.e. I know it's
> faster but is it also better and more reliable?

In my experience, NOS2.0 and NOS2.1 are *worlds* apart regarding HWR. Not
only is the 2100 ten times faster, it is only much more accurate. If I writ=
e
in German, I can get up to about 90-95%. Cursive.
But the speed alone is worth the upgrade.

Oliver :)

--
"Stell Dir einen singenden Boten vor, der auch ein bisschen malen kann
und ziemlich nervt. Und dessen Absender gar nichts zu sagen hat, sondern
nur etwas Geld von Dir will. Solche Typen hat man fr=FCher umgebracht.
Heute l=F6scht man einfach die html-Mail..." Patrick Rudin in d.c.i.w.a.m

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:02:02 EST