Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?

From: Konstantinos Xonis (Konstantinos.Xonis_at_physik.uni-giessen.de)
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 12:35:26 EST

Next message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Previous message: Rolf Brakvatne: "[NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
In reply to: Benjamin: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Next in thread: John Ruschmeyer: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Benjamin said (D) k
> I think it's not necessary a PalmOS device, maybe some other OS I really
> can't imagine Palm OS working with a real harddrive with a real file
> system.

Xcuse me for this comment, but it already does... Take the PalmOS device
sony built, has MemoryStick, take Handsprings Visor, has CompactFlash.
And bot use a (V)FAT filesystem, so there is no big leap in supporting
a harddrive.

[...]

-- Konstantinos XONIS (XAKChaos of XAK-Design Wetzlar) Pestalozzistr. 8 FAX: +49 6441 390 943 D35576 Wetzlar TEL: +49 6441 390 944 or (mobile) +49 177 7025 529 FR Germany

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Previous message: Rolf Brakvatne: "[NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
In reply to: Benjamin: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Next in thread: John Ruschmeyer: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:02:18 EST