[NTLK] eMate vs. 2100

From: Rolf Brakvatne (rbrak29_at_qwest.net)
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 12:28:00 EST

Next message: Konstantinos Xonis: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Previous message: Benjamin: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Next in thread: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Reply: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Maybe reply: Jim Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Maybe reply: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

How is the e-mail download speed of a 2100 compared to that of an eMate
(600K free memory with a 32MB card). This would be a DSL connection via a
Farrallon card. 28 messages (small) take 6 to 7 minutes to download on the
eMate. Would I see a large difference moving to a 2100.
Thanks.

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Konstantinos Xonis: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Previous message: Benjamin: "Re: [NTLK] Apple PDA?"
Next in thread: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Reply: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Maybe reply: Jim Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Maybe reply: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:02:18 EST