At 04:49 PM 4/29/2002 -0400, newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net wrote:
>Subject: [NTLK] LookOut vs. Outlink...
>Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:21:37 -0400
>From: <tfbiii_at_nbscomputers.net>
>
>I'm not trying to start anything, I just want to say that after being
>very disappointed with Outlink in the past I decided to try it again
>after upgrading to Outlook XP/2002. I must say that I'm somewhat
>surprised...it works without error!. Same PC, same OS, new version of
>Outlook. It seems faster that LookOut also, and less user intervention
>is needed. Anyone who had shied away from it in the past should take
>another look.
Outlink works fine for me, with the exception of it not syncing the
LOCATION field. The docs try to blame the Newton storage structure for
that, but somehow LookOut was able to manage it.
Otherwise, I use it every day to stay in sync with my corporate calendar
and it works just peachily.
-Jeremy
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun May 05 2002 - 14:05:28 EDT