Re: [NTLK] Another Woo gem (was Pocket Quicken)

From: Philip Bennett (pbnt_at_mac.com)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 08:21:29 EDT


On 4/26/02 12:34 AM, "Robert Benschop" <rbenschop_at_mac.com> wrote:

>
> on 25-04-2002 11:42, Phil Denton at nanjad_at_ozemail.com.au wrote:
>
>> Could I suggest that such valuable information be given due status by e.g.
>> reposting with a bracketed subject header indicating 'tried and tested
>> advice' [TATA], 'this actually works' [TAW],'known working solution' [KWS],
>> or some such label. This might properly be done after confirmation the
>> advice is good.
>
> Since my rusty early morning (7.30 am and too little sleep, but when
> children wake up, what can you do except tie them to their beds ;-)
> brain had to look up your IIRC and KISS acronyms I don't really want to ad
> more of them.
> Apart from the fact that we would need to ad a much longer sig to explain
> all of this.
> And in the end we always get there, don't we ?
>
ASAP, IMHO. PDQ

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun May 05 2002 - 14:05:09 EDT