Re: [NTLK] why not split the list?

From: Eric L. Strobel (fyzycyst_at_home.com)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2001 - 08:40:09 EST

Next message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] newton + entourage v.x?"
Previous message: aaron tester: "Re: [NTLK] Giving Thanks"
In reply to: ThisOlNewt_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] why not split the list?"
Next in thread: Hal Widlansky: "[NTLK] backup battery in 2100?"
Reply: Hal Widlansky: "[NTLK] backup battery in 2100?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

at the temporal coordinates: 11/21/01 8:02 AM, the entity known as
ThisOlNewt_at_aol.com at ThisOlNewt_at_aol.com conveyed the following:

>
>
> In a message dated 11/21/01 5:30:14 AM, matthew_at_crescent.org.uk writes:
>
> << off-topic >>
>
> THERE ALREADY IS AN OFFTOPIC LIST...ARGH
>

Perhaps that needs to be added to the NewtonTalk list info that's appended
to each and every message. For example, I saw some message traffic that
made the suggestion for that, but that whole thread was getting extremely
tedious and silly and so I started ignoring it. I honestly don't recall if
I ever saw a message to that effect.

- Eric.

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] newton + entourage v.x?"
Previous message: aaron tester: "Re: [NTLK] Giving Thanks"
In reply to: ThisOlNewt_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] why not split the list?"
Next in thread: Hal Widlansky: "[NTLK] backup battery in 2100?"
Reply: Hal Widlansky: "[NTLK] backup battery in 2100?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:03:24 EST