on 11/6/01 4:34 PM, brian.tiplady_at_astrazeneca.com at
brian.tiplady_at_astrazeneca.com wrote:
> I suspect this is an area where European and US interpretations of fair use
> or fair dealing diverge. Here is an excerpt from a US site (eff):
>
> Do I have the right to make a copy of my CD for my own personal use?
To further confuse the issue, the "fair use" clause isn't really a clause at
all, if my memory serves me correctly. It is the ruling on a Supreme Court
case, and has never been coded into law. Or, maybe I'm wrong, and it was
coded at one point that I missed, but originally, it was a SC ruling, which
often serves to merely muddy the law, rather than clearing. :-)
-- -Jon Glass Krakow, Poland <mailto:jonglass_at_usa.net> <mailto:glasshaus5_at_aol.com> If we can put aside these emotionally moving but strictly irrelevant aspects of the killing of a baby we can see that the grounds for not killing persons do not apply to newborn infants. . . . Killing them, therefore, cannot be equated with killing normal human beings, or any other self-conscious beings." --Dr. Peter Singer, professor of bio-ethics, Princeton-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:02:13 EST