Re: [NTLK] Simple Mail Question

From: Patrick Meuleman (Patrick2_at_goldenglow.com.au)
Date: Fri Jul 13 2001 - 00:45:12 EDT


Thanks, I'll give it a go.

-----Original Message-----
From: newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net
[mailto:newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net] On Behalf Of Peter Cameron
Sent: Friday, 13 July 2001 14:32
To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
Subject: Re: [NTLK] Simple Mail Question

on 7/12/01 10:14 PM, Patrick Meuleman at Patrick2_at_goldenglow.com.au wrote:

> I've just started trying out simplemail (was using Enroute before) and I
> have a question. With Enroute when I check my mail (i.e. "receive" from
the
> InBox) it automatically sends any mail that I have in my out box (after it
> has checked if I have any new mail to be received). I can't seem to get
> simple mail to behave in the same manner (i.e. I have to explicitly tell
it
> to send mail). Is there a setting somewhere that I'm overlooking?

    SimpleMail just works the other way round. If you send mail it will also
check to see if you've received any. So, send the mail you have queued first
and it will check for received mail before hanging up. Same effect, just
opposite order.
    Hope this helps.

Peter

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:49:48 EDT