Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?

From: Ed Kummel (tech_ed_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Dec 26 2001 - 13:38:08 EST

Next message: Chris Searles: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Problems with Nethopper"
In reply to: Chris Searles: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Next in thread: Chris Searles: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

As long as you record at the highest possible setting.
(I believe that's 8k?)which has the audio quality of
an AM radio or a digital cell phone.
Ed
web/gadget guru

--- Chris Searles <csearles_at_netcologne.de> wrote:
>
> >But pre-recorded stuff is quite loud!
>
> And clearly audible, i.e. can spoken language also
> be clearly understood
> at a distance of several meters?
>

=====
Just because you're a genius, doesn't make you a smart guy!
- The Powerpuff Girls -

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Chris Searles: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Problems with Nethopper"
In reply to: Chris Searles: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Next in thread: Chris Searles: "Re: [NTLK] Newton 2100 Loudspeaker quality?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 02 2002 - 12:02:06 EST