gopi (gopi@sloth.org) wrote:
> PowerComputing's machines were _not_ superior to Apple's in any way.
> Cheaper components, cheaper cases, cheaper drives, etc. etc.
> I worked as a hardware techie on both, and I can assure you that Apple's
> machines were better.
Not all the clones were created equal. The Umax clones were actually
quite good, their quality comparable to Apple's best offerings. I for one
wouldn't give up my 6-slot Umax tower just now.
Michael J. Hussmann
Redaktion macmagazin
Leverkusenstrasse 54 VII
D-22761 Hamburg
Germany
E-Mail: michael@macmagazin.de
******************************************
This NewtonTalk Message brought to you by:
EVOTE.COM, the ESPN of Politics on the
Internet. Visit EVOTE.COM for all the latest
news on Campaign 2000!
Visit http://www.evote.com today!
******************************************
Need Subscribe/Unsubscribe Info?
visit http://www.planetnewton.com
******************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 03 2000 - 09:41:16 EDT