On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Chris Ruprecht wrote:
> I second this, I think one list for our relatively small community is
> quite sufficient and the traffic is not high enough to warrant
> splitting this into 2 or more lists. If this is not enough, there is
> always comp.sys.newton.*
>
Trying not to sound like a broken record...
I third this, whatever it is :) If there isn't any content difference
between the two lists, then why have two lists? It's different with the
eMate list, since I assume then discuss exclusively eMate-related things
there, and that's cool. Fragmenting the community is not cool: I already
read this and c.s.n.*, and I can only hope that I had enough time to read
the web boards, but I don't.
-----Victor Rehorst - victor@eddie.cis.uoguelph.ca | victor@torque.net------
---Newton Resources: Ethernet, Newton Cage, NewtonTalk archive, and more!---
--------------- http://eddie.cis.uoguelph.ca/~victor/newton/ ---------------
----------------------"The Few, The Proud, The Green."----------------------
******************************************
This month's NewtonTalk brought to you by:
EVOTE.COM, the ultimate Political Junkie site on the 'Net.
The Clinton Administration, the George Bush
2000 Campaign, and almost every other major
U.S. politician has said something nasty
about us at some time. Find out why at:
http://www.evote.com
******************************************
Need Subscribe/Unsubscribe info?
Visit http://www.planetnewton.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 01 2000 - 00:00:09 EST